The title of this post was stolen from a 2009 study of the same name written by Saul P. Wachs
and published by The Solomon Schechter Day School Association.
The study opens with the following disclaimer:
This paper is based on a presentation by Dr. Wachs at
the Solomon Schechter Day School Association Professionals Conference in
January 2008. The conference, which took place at the
Solomon Schechter Day School of Las Vegas, was devoted to the
spirituality of students and day school professionals.
Dr. Wachs here a comprehensive and thought provoking
framework for developing the spiritual dimension of tefilla–a framework
that can inform the practice not only of Schechter schools, but
all who hope to initiate students into Jewish spiritual life.
The Solomon Schechter Day School Association offers
this booklet as part of its vision of assisting Jewish days schools to be
places of ahavat torah and yirat shamayim.
So with that said, I want to share some reflections and
critiques that I observed. I think it is important to state that in my
search for materials on the topic of tefilla and how to evaluate
its instruction, this is one of the few pedagogical documents out in the
public sphere.
Wachs identifies a lot of the problems with tefilla in
day-schools and concludes that it "has to do with what was done when the
pupils were young and in the process of forming a basic set of attitudes
towards tefilla" and that for most it was an "exercise in skills
and nothing more". I think this to be a astute diagnosis. To
his credit Wachs puts forward a list of suggestions to develop what he calls
"omek" (depth) in the service. One general criticism (and one
that some readers have made of this blog) is that the suggestions make for good
"one-off" lesson plans that will inspire students for that specific
day, but do not create a systematic approach to build spiritual confidence.
The title of this booklet - Towards a Theory of
Practice - is appropriate in that it I am unsure if a) the
approach is anything more than a collection
of anecdotal experiences coalescing into a theory and b) if
it was ever implemented and analysed for statistical analysis. (On
page 16 Wachs indicates that he surveyed three schools in differen parts of the
US). Some of Wachs' idea for engaging students in "Kedusha and Yofi",
dance, poetry and art are worthy approaches but I question whether they offer
more than temporal inspirational experiences. Further, are teachers in
this school ready to take on this task of moving beyond skills and
theory?
I very much liked Wachs' idea of iyun tefilla -
"a process wherein teacher and pupils search together
for meanings that are stated or implied in the text" (17).
This conceptual approach is already used by many schools but there is not
any standardized or published texts that can be shared with other educators nor
is there evaluative research for different approaches, ideologies or
ages.
Over the next two weeks I will be sharing specific nuggets
from the booklet that I think are worth noting. One final point, I would
also be interested to hear from other teachers, from Conservative, Orthodox and
Non-Denominational schools whether this paper reflects a road map to
improving tefilla.
For me, it is the sustained effort to create meaningful t'fillot that is most challenging. I can pull off very successful "one-shot" programs or experiences that give the children a "deep" t'fillah experience but translating that into a sustained approach to t'fillah is what I'm really struggling to do - especially when the burden of teaching the skills is so present.
ReplyDelete